molecule-core/docs/architecture/canary-release.md
Hongming Wang bc82fa4e0e docs(security): move sensitive runbooks to private internal repo
Three changes to stop ferrying sensitive content through our public
monorepo. All content already imported to Molecule-AI/internal (private)
— see linked PRs below.

## docs/incidents/INCIDENT_LOG.md — replaced with stub

Contained full security audit cycle records with CWE references,
file:line pointers to historical vulnerabilities, and severity
ratings. None of that belongs in a public repo.

→ Moved to Molecule-AI/internal/security/incident-log.md (PR #20).
  Monorepo file becomes a 17-line stub pointing at the internal
  location. Future incidents land in the internal file only.

## docs/architecture/canary-release.md — redacted identifiers

Had AWS account ID `004947743811` and IAM role name
`MoleculeStagingProvisioner` embedded. Even though the fleet
described isn't actually running (see state note), these
identifiers are account-specific and don't belong in public git.

→ Removed both values, replaced with generic references + a pointer
  to Molecule-AI/internal/runbooks/canary-fleet.md (PR #21) where
  the actual identifiers live. Any future rotation touches the
  internal file, no public-git-history rewrite needed.

## docs/infra/workspace-terminal.md — reduced to public summary

Contained the full ops runbook: bootstrap script output, per-tenant
SG backfill loop with live SG IDs, customer slug names
(hongmingwang). Useful content but too specific for a public repo.

→ Moved to Molecule-AI/internal/runbooks/workspace-terminal.md
  (PR #22). Monorepo file becomes a 30-line public summary of what
  the feature does + pointers to code, so external readers /
  self-hosters still get the design story.

## What's NOT in this PR (follow-up)

Marketing briefs, SEO plans, campaign copy, research dossiers, and
internal product designs (hermes-adapter-plan, medo-integration,
cognee-*) are the next batches. See docs policy doc coming next to
set team expectations.

Net removal: ~820 lines from public git going forward.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-04-22 14:17:11 -07:00

4.9 KiB

Canary release pipeline

How a workspace-server code change reaches the prod tenant fleet — and how to stop it if something's wrong.

⚠️ State note (2026-04-22): this doc describes the intended design. As of this write, the canary fleet described below is not actually running — no canary tenants are provisioned, CANARY_TENANT_URLS / CANARY_ADMIN_TOKENS / CANARY_CP_SHARED_SECRET are empty in repo secrets, and canary-verify.yml fails every run.

Current merges gate on manual promote-latest.yml dispatches, not canary. See molecule-controlplane/docs/canary-tenants.md for the Phase 1 code work that's already shipped + the Phase 2 plan for actually standing up the fleet + a "should we even do this now?" decision framework.

Account-specific identifiers (AWS account ID, IAM role name) referenced below in the original design have been redacted from this public doc. The actual values — if they exist — are in Molecule-AI/internal/runbooks/canary-fleet.md. If you're implementing Phase 2, start there.

When Phase 2 lands, delete this note and reconcile the two docs.

The loop

PR merged to staging → main
      │
      ▼
publish-workspace-server-image.yml   ← pushes :staging-<sha> ONLY
      │                                (NOT :latest — prod is untouched)
      ▼
Canary tenants auto-update to :staging-<sha>
      │   (5-min auto-updater cycle on each canary EC2)
      ▼
canary-verify.yml waits 6 min, runs scripts/canary-smoke.sh
      │
      ├─► GREEN → crane tag :staging-<sha> → :latest
      │                                       │
      │                                       ▼
      │                           Prod tenants auto-update within 5 min
      │
      └─► RED   → :latest stays on prior good digest
                  GitHub Step Summary flags the rejected sha
                  Ops fixes forward OR rolls back manually

Canary fleet

Lives in a separate AWS account via an assumed role. The CP's is_canary org flag routes provisioning there; every other org goes to the default account. Specific account ID and role name are tracked in the internal runbook (Molecule-AI/internal/runbooks/canary-fleet.md) rather than here, so rotating them doesn't require rewriting public git history.

Canary tenants are configured to pull :staging-<sha> (not :latest) via TENANT_IMAGE on their provisioner, so they ingest each new build before prod does.

Smoke suite

scripts/canary-smoke.sh hits each canary tenant (URL + ADMIN_TOKEN pair) and asserts:

  • /admin/liveness returns a subsystems map (tenant booted, AdminAuth reachable)
  • /workspaces returns a JSON array (wsAuth + DB healthy)
  • /memories/commit + /memories/search round-trip (encryption + scrubber)
  • /events admin read (C4 fail-closed proof)
  • /admin/liveness without bearer → 401 (C4 regression gate)

Expand by editing the script — each check "name" "expected" "$response" call is one line.

Adding a canary tenant

  1. POST /cp/orgs — create the org normally (is_canary defaults to false)
  2. POST /cp/admin/orgs/<slug>/canary with {"is_canary": true} — admin only, refuses to flip if already provisioned
  3. Re-trigger provision (or delete + recreate if the org was already provisioned into staging) — the fresh EC2 lands in the canary AWS account (see internal runbook for the specific ID)

Then set repo secrets:

  • CANARY_TENANT_URLS — append the new tenant's URL
  • CANARY_ADMIN_TOKENS — append its ADMIN_TOKEN in the same position

Rolling back :latest

When canary was green but something surfaces post-promotion, retag :latest to a prior digest:

export GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_...    # write:packages
scripts/rollback-latest.sh 4c1d56e  # retags both platform + tenant images

scripts/rollback-latest.sh pre-checks that :staging-<sha> exists before moving :latest, and verifies the digest after the move. Prod tenants pick up the rolled-back image on their next 5-min auto-update.

A post-mortem should always include:

  • the commit sha that broke
  • why canary didn't catch it (new code path the smoke suite doesn't exercise?)
  • whether the smoke suite should grow a new check to prevent the same class of bug

What this gate doesn't catch

  • Bugs that only surface under prod-only data (customer workloads with scale or shape canary doesn't produce). Canary uses real traffic shapes but can't simulate weeks of accumulated state.
  • Config drift between canary and prod (different env-var values, different feature flags). Keep canary's config deltas minimal and documented.
  • Cross-tenant interactions — canary tenants run in their own AWS account, so a bug that only appears when two tenants compete for a shared resource won't reproduce here.

When these miss, rollback-latest.sh is the escape hatch.