2026-05-14 02:02:00 +00:00
7 changed files with 266 additions and 97 deletions
--- a/.gitea/scripts/review-refire-status.sh
+++ b/.gitea/scripts/review-refire-status.sh
@ -0,0 +1,81 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+# Re-run review-check.sh for a slash-command refire and post the protected
+# pull_request status context to the PR head SHA.
+
+set -euo pipefail
+
+: "${GITEA_TOKEN:?GITEA_TOKEN required}"
+: "${GITEA_HOST:?GITEA_HOST required}"
+: "${REPO:?REPO required}"
+: "${PR_NUMBER:?PR_NUMBER required}"
+: "${TEAM:?TEAM required}"
+
+OWNER="${REPO%%/*}"
+NAME="${REPO##*/}"
+API="https://${GITEA_HOST}/api/v1"
+CONTEXT="${TEAM}-review / approved (pull_request)"
+TARGET_URL="https://${GITEA_HOST}/${OWNER}/${NAME}/pulls/${PR_NUMBER}"
+
+authfile=$(mktemp)
+prfile=$(mktemp)
+postfile=$(mktemp)
+# shellcheck disable=SC2329 # invoked by EXIT trap
+cleanup() {
+  rm -f "$authfile" "$prfile" "$postfile"
+}
+trap cleanup EXIT
+
+chmod 600 "$authfile"
+printf 'header = "Authorization: token %s"\n' "$GITEA_TOKEN" > "$authfile"
+
+code=$(curl -sS -o "$prfile" -w '%{http_code}' -K "$authfile" \
+  "${API}/repos/${OWNER}/${NAME}/pulls/${PR_NUMBER}")
+if [ "$code" != "200" ]; then
+  echo "::error::GET /pulls/${PR_NUMBER} returned HTTP ${code}"
+  head -c 200 "$prfile" >&2 || true
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+head_sha=$(jq -r '.head.sha // ""' "$prfile")
+state=$(jq -r '.state // ""' "$prfile")
+if [ -z "$head_sha" ] || [ "$head_sha" = "null" ]; then
+  echo "::error::Could not resolve PR head SHA for PR ${PR_NUMBER}"
+  exit 1
+fi
+if [ "$state" != "open" ]; then
+  echo "::notice::PR ${PR_NUMBER} is ${state}; ${TEAM}-review refire is a no-op"
+  exit 0
+fi
+
+set +e
+bash .gitea/scripts/review-check.sh
+rc=$?
+set -e
+
+if [ "$rc" -eq 0 ]; then
+  status_state="success"
+  description="Refired via /${TEAM}-recheck by ${COMMENT_AUTHOR:-unknown}"
+else
+  status_state="failure"
+  description="Refired via /${TEAM}-recheck; ${TEAM}-review failed"
+fi
+
+body=$(jq -nc \
+  --arg state "$status_state" \
+  --arg context "$CONTEXT" \
+  --arg description "$description" \
+  --arg target_url "$TARGET_URL" \
+  '{state:$state, context:$context, description:$description, target_url:$target_url}')
+
+code=$(curl -sS -o "$postfile" -w '%{http_code}' -X POST \
+  -K "$authfile" -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
+  -d "$body" \
+  "${API}/repos/${OWNER}/${NAME}/statuses/${head_sha}")
+if [ "$code" != "200" ] && [ "$code" != "201" ]; then
+  echo "::error::POST /statuses/${head_sha} returned HTTP ${code}"
+  head -c 200 "$postfile" >&2 || true
+  exit 1
+fi
+
+echo "::notice::posted ${status_state} for context=\"${CONTEXT}\" on sha=${head_sha}"
+exit "$rc"
--- a/.gitea/scripts/tests/test_sop_checklist_gate.py
+++ b/.gitea/scripts/tests/test_sop_checklist_gate.py
@ -134,18 +134,22 @@ class TestParseDirectives(unittest.TestCase):
    def setUp(self):
        self.aliases = _numeric_aliases()

+    def parse_ack_revoke(self, body):
+        directives, na_directives = sop.parse_directives(body, self.aliases)
+        self.assertEqual(na_directives, [])
+        return directives
+
    def test_simple_ack(self):
-        d = sop.parse_directives("/sop-ack comprehensive-testing", self.aliases)
+        d = self.parse_ack_revoke("/sop-ack comprehensive-testing")
        self.assertEqual(d, [("sop-ack", "comprehensive-testing", "")])

    def test_simple_revoke(self):
-        d = sop.parse_directives("/sop-revoke staging-smoke", self.aliases)
+        d = self.parse_ack_revoke("/sop-revoke staging-smoke")
        self.assertEqual(d, [("sop-revoke", "staging-smoke", "")])

    def test_ack_with_note(self):
-        d = sop.parse_directives(
-            "/sop-ack comprehensive-testing LGTM the test covers all edge cases",
-            self.aliases,
+        d = self.parse_ack_revoke(
+            "/sop-ack comprehensive-testing LGTM the test covers all edge cases"
        )
        self.assertEqual(len(d), 1)
        self.assertEqual(d[0][0], "sop-ack")
@ -153,13 +157,12 @@ class TestParseDirectives(unittest.TestCase):
        self.assertIn("LGTM", d[0][2])

    def test_numeric_shorthand(self):
-        d = sop.parse_directives("/sop-ack 1", self.aliases)
+        d = self.parse_ack_revoke("/sop-ack 1")
        self.assertEqual(d, [("sop-ack", "comprehensive-testing", "")])

    def test_revoke_with_reason(self):
-        d = sop.parse_directives(
-            "/sop-revoke comprehensive-testing realized the e2e was mocking the DB",
-            self.aliases,
+        d = self.parse_ack_revoke(
+            "/sop-revoke comprehensive-testing realized the e2e was mocking the DB"
        )
        self.assertEqual(d[0][0], "sop-revoke")
        self.assertEqual(d[0][1], "comprehensive-testing")
@ -171,7 +174,7 @@ class TestParseDirectives(unittest.TestCase):
            "/sop-ack comprehensive-testing\n"
            "Will follow up on the doc nit separately."
        )
-        d = sop.parse_directives(body, self.aliases)
+        d = self.parse_ack_revoke(body)
        self.assertEqual(len(d), 1)
        self.assertEqual(d[0][1], "comprehensive-testing")

@ -180,7 +183,7 @@ class TestParseDirectives(unittest.TestCase):
            "/sop-ack comprehensive-testing\n"
            "/sop-ack local-postgres-e2e\n"
        )
-        d = sop.parse_directives(body, self.aliases)
+        d = self.parse_ack_revoke(body)
        self.assertEqual(len(d), 2)
        slugs = {x[1] for x in d}
        self.assertEqual(slugs, {"comprehensive-testing", "local-postgres-e2e"})
@ -189,21 +192,21 @@ class TestParseDirectives(unittest.TestCase):
        # A directive embedded mid-line is not honored (prevents review
        # comments like "to /sop-ack you need..." from acting as acks).
        body = "If you want to /sop-ack comprehensive-testing reply in this thread"
-        d = sop.parse_directives(body, self.aliases)
+        d = self.parse_ack_revoke(body)
        self.assertEqual(d, [])

    def test_leading_whitespace_allowed(self):
        body = "  /sop-ack comprehensive-testing"
-        d = sop.parse_directives(body, self.aliases)
+        d = self.parse_ack_revoke(body)
        self.assertEqual(len(d), 1)

    def test_empty_body(self):
-        self.assertEqual(sop.parse_directives("", self.aliases), [])
-        self.assertEqual(sop.parse_directives(None, self.aliases), [])
+        self.assertEqual(sop.parse_directives("", self.aliases), ([], []))
+        self.assertEqual(sop.parse_directives(None, self.aliases), ([], []))

    def test_normalization_applied(self):
        # /sop-ack Comprehensive_Testing → canonical comprehensive-testing
-        d = sop.parse_directives("/sop-ack Comprehensive_Testing", self.aliases)
+        d = self.parse_ack_revoke("/sop-ack Comprehensive_Testing")
        self.assertEqual(d[0][1], "comprehensive-testing")


--- a/.gitea/scripts/tests/test_sop_tier_refire.sh
+++ b/.gitea/scripts/tests/test_sop_tier_refire.sh
@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ THIS_DIR="$(cd "$(dirname "$0")" && pwd)"
 SCRIPT_DIR="$(cd "$THIS_DIR/.." && pwd)"
 WORKFLOW_DIR="$(cd "$THIS_DIR/../../workflows" && pwd)"
 WORKFLOW="$WORKFLOW_DIR/sop-tier-refire.yml"
+DISPATCH_WORKFLOW="$WORKFLOW_DIR/review-refire-comments.yml"
 SCRIPT="$SCRIPT_DIR/sop-tier-refire.sh"

 PASS=0
@ -87,6 +88,7 @@ assert_file_exists() {
 echo
 echo "== existence =="
 assert_file_exists "workflow file exists"  "$WORKFLOW"
+assert_file_exists "dispatcher workflow file exists" "$DISPATCH_WORKFLOW"
 assert_file_exists "script file exists"    "$SCRIPT"
 if [ "$FAIL" -gt 0 ]; then
  echo
@ -104,29 +106,43 @@ echo "== T6/T7 workflow yaml =="
 PARSE_OUT=$(python3 -c 'import sys,yaml;yaml.safe_load(open(sys.argv[1]).read());print("ok")' "$WORKFLOW" 2>&1 || true)
 assert_eq "T7 workflow parses as YAML" "ok" "$PARSE_OUT"

-# Three required gates in the `if:` expression
+# The old per-workflow issue_comment listener caused queue storms because
+# Gitea queues jobs before evaluating job-level `if:`. The script remains,
+# but comment-triggered refires route through the single dispatcher.
 WORKFLOW_CONTENT=$(cat "$WORKFLOW")
-assert_contains "T6a workflow if: contains author_association gate" \
-  "github.event.comment.author_association" "$WORKFLOW_CONTENT"
-assert_contains "T6b workflow if: gates on MEMBER/OWNER/COLLABORATOR" \
-  '["MEMBER","OWNER","COLLABORATOR"]' "$WORKFLOW_CONTENT"
-assert_contains "T6c workflow if: contains slash-command trigger" \
-  "/refire-tier-check" "$WORKFLOW_CONTENT"
-assert_contains "T6d workflow if: gates on PR-not-issue" \
-  "github.event.issue.pull_request" "$WORKFLOW_CONTENT"
-assert_contains "T6e workflow listens on issue_comment" \
-  "issue_comment" "$WORKFLOW_CONTENT"
-assert_contains "T6f workflow requests statuses:write permission" \
-  "statuses: write" "$WORKFLOW_CONTENT"
-# Does NOT check out PR HEAD (security)
-if grep -q 'ref: \${{ github.event.pull_request.head' "$WORKFLOW"; then
-  echo "  FAIL  T6g workflow MUST NOT check out PR head (security)"
+if printf '%s' "$WORKFLOW_CONTENT" | grep -q '^  issue_comment:'; then
+  echo "  FAIL  T6a manual fallback workflow must not listen on issue_comment"
  FAIL=$((FAIL + 1))
-  FAILED_TESTS="${FAILED_TESTS} T6g"
+  FAILED_TESTS="${FAILED_TESTS} T6a"
 else
-  echo "  PASS  T6g workflow does not check out PR head"
+  echo "  PASS  T6a manual fallback workflow does not listen on issue_comment"
  PASS=$((PASS + 1))
 fi
+assert_contains "T6b workflow exposes workflow_dispatch" \
+  "workflow_dispatch" "$WORKFLOW_CONTENT"
+assert_contains "T6c workflow documents unsupported manual inputs" \
+  "workflow_dispatch inputs" "$WORKFLOW_CONTENT"
+# Does NOT check out PR HEAD (security)
+if grep -q 'ref: \${{ github.event.pull_request.head' "$WORKFLOW"; then
+  echo "  FAIL  T6d workflow MUST NOT check out PR head (security)"
+  FAIL=$((FAIL + 1))
+  FAILED_TESTS="${FAILED_TESTS} T6d"
+else
+  echo "  PASS  T6d workflow does not check out PR head"
+  PASS=$((PASS + 1))
+fi
+
+DISPATCH_PARSE_OUT=$(python3 -c 'import sys,yaml;yaml.safe_load(open(sys.argv[1]).read());print("ok")' "$DISPATCH_WORKFLOW" 2>&1 || true)
+assert_eq "T6e dispatcher workflow parses as YAML" "ok" "$DISPATCH_PARSE_OUT"
+DISPATCH_CONTENT=$(cat "$DISPATCH_WORKFLOW")
+assert_contains "T6f dispatcher listens on issue_comment" \
+  "issue_comment" "$DISPATCH_CONTENT"
+assert_contains "T6g dispatcher handles /qa-recheck" \
+  "/qa-recheck" "$DISPATCH_CONTENT"
+assert_contains "T6h dispatcher handles /security-recheck" \
+  "/security-recheck" "$DISPATCH_CONTENT"
+assert_contains "T6i dispatcher handles /refire-tier-check" \
+  "/refire-tier-check" "$DISPATCH_CONTENT"

 # T1-T5 — script behavior against a local Gitea-fixture
 echo
--- a/.gitea/workflows/qa-review.yml
+++ b/.gitea/workflows/qa-review.yml
@ -9,10 +9,10 @@
 #   Triggers on:
 #     - `pull_request_target`: opened, synchronize, reopened
 #         → initial status posts when PR opens / re-pushes
-#     - `issue_comment`: /qa-recheck slash-command on the PR
-#         → manual re-fire after a QA reviewer clicks APPROVE
-#           (Gitea 1.22.6 doesn't re-fire on pull_request_review, per
-#           go-gitea/gitea#33700 + feedback_pull_request_review_no_refire)
+#     - comment refires are handled by `review-refire-comments.yml`
+#         → a single issue_comment dispatcher prevents every SOP/review
+#           comment from enqueueing separate qa/security/tier jobs on
+#           Gitea 1.22.6 before job-level `if:` can skip them.
 #   Workflow name = `qa-review` ; job name = `approved`.
 #   The job's own pass/fail conclusion publishes the status context
 #   `qa-review / approved (<event>)` — NO `POST /statuses` call → NO
@ -85,8 +85,6 @@ name: qa-review
 on:
  pull_request_target:
    types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]
-  issue_comment:
-    types: [created]

 permissions:
  contents: read
@ -97,16 +95,10 @@ jobs:
  approved:
    # Gate the job:
    #   - On pull_request_target events: always run.
-    #   - On issue_comment events: only when it's a PR comment and the body
-    #     contains the slash-command. NO privilege gate at the step level
-    #     (RFC#324 v1.3 §A1.1): a non-collaborator's /qa-recheck is fine
-    #     because the eval is read-only and idempotent — re-running it
-    #     just re-confirms whether a real team-member APPROVE exists.
+    # Comment-triggered refires live in review-refire-comments.yml. Keeping
+    # this workflow PR-only avoids comment-triggered queue storms.
    if: |
-      github.event_name == 'pull_request_target' ||
-      (github.event_name == 'issue_comment' &&
-       github.event.issue.pull_request != null &&
-       startsWith(github.event.comment.body, '/qa-recheck'))
+      github.event_name == 'pull_request_target'
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Privilege check (A1.1 — INFORMATIONAL log only, NOT a gate)
--- a/.gitea/workflows/review-refire-comments.yml
+++ b/.gitea/workflows/review-refire-comments.yml
@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
+# Consolidated comment dispatcher for manual review/tier refires.
+#
+# Gitea 1.22 queues one run per workflow subscribed to `issue_comment` before
+# evaluating job-level `if:`. SOP-heavy PRs therefore created queue storms when
+# qa-review, security-review, sop-checklist-gate, and sop-tier-refire all
+# listened to comments. This workflow is the single non-SOP comment subscriber:
+# ordinary comments no-op quickly; slash commands post the required status
+# contexts to the PR head SHA.
+
+name: review-refire-comments
+
+on:
+  issue_comment:
+    types: [created]
+
+permissions:
+  contents: read
+  pull-requests: read
+  statuses: write
+
+jobs:
+  dispatch:
+    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
+    steps:
+      - name: Classify comment
+        id: classify
+        env:
+          COMMENT_BODY: ${{ github.event.comment.body }}
+          IS_PR: ${{ github.event.issue.pull_request != null }}
+        run: |
+          set -euo pipefail
+          {
+            echo "run_qa=false"
+            echo "run_security=false"
+            echo "run_tier=false"
+          } >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
+          if [ "$IS_PR" != "true" ]; then
+            echo "::notice::not a PR comment; no-op"
+            exit 0
+          fi
+          first_line=$(printf '%s\n' "$COMMENT_BODY" | sed -n '1p')
+          case "$first_line" in
+            /qa-recheck*)
+              echo "run_qa=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
+              ;;
+            /security-recheck*)
+              echo "run_security=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
+              ;;
+            /refire-tier-check*)
+              echo "run_tier=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT"
+              ;;
+            *)
+              echo "::notice::no supported review refire slash command; no-op"
+              ;;
+          esac
+
+      - name: Check out BASE ref for trusted scripts
+        if: |
+          steps.classify.outputs.run_qa == 'true' ||
+          steps.classify.outputs.run_security == 'true' ||
+          steps.classify.outputs.run_tier == 'true'
+        uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd  # v6.0.2
+        with:
+          ref: ${{ github.event.repository.default_branch }}
+
+      - name: Refire qa-review status
+        if: steps.classify.outputs.run_qa == 'true'
+        env:
+          GITEA_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.RFC_324_TEAM_READ_TOKEN || secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
+          GITEA_HOST: git.moleculesai.app
+          REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
+          PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
+          DEFAULT_BRANCH: ${{ github.event.repository.default_branch }}
+          TEAM: qa
+          TEAM_ID: '20'
+          REVIEW_CHECK_DEBUG: '0'
+          REVIEW_CHECK_STRICT: '0'
+          COMMENT_AUTHOR: ${{ github.event.comment.user.login }}
+        run: |
+          set -euo pipefail
+          .gitea/scripts/review-refire-status.sh
+
+      - name: Refire security-review status
+        if: steps.classify.outputs.run_security == 'true'
+        env:
+          GITEA_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.RFC_324_TEAM_READ_TOKEN || secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
+          GITEA_HOST: git.moleculesai.app
+          REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
+          PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
+          DEFAULT_BRANCH: ${{ github.event.repository.default_branch }}
+          TEAM: security
+          TEAM_ID: '21'
+          REVIEW_CHECK_DEBUG: '0'
+          REVIEW_CHECK_STRICT: '0'
+          COMMENT_AUTHOR: ${{ github.event.comment.user.login }}
+        run: |
+          set -euo pipefail
+          .gitea/scripts/review-refire-status.sh
+
+      - name: Refire sop-tier-check status
+        if: steps.classify.outputs.run_tier == 'true'
+        env:
+          GITEA_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SOP_TIER_CHECK_TOKEN || secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
+          GITEA_HOST: git.moleculesai.app
+          REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
+          PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
+          COMMENT_AUTHOR: ${{ github.event.comment.user.login }}
+          SOP_DEBUG: '0'
+        run: bash .gitea/scripts/sop-tier-refire.sh
--- a/.gitea/workflows/security-review.yml
+++ b/.gitea/workflows/security-review.yml
@ -12,8 +12,6 @@ name: security-review
 on:
  pull_request_target:
    types: [opened, synchronize, reopened]
-  issue_comment:
-    types: [created]

 permissions:
  contents: read
@ -22,13 +20,10 @@ permissions:
 jobs:
  # bp-exempt: PR security review bot signal; required merge state is enforced by CI / all-required.
  approved:
-    # See qa-review.yml header for full A1-α / A1.1 (v1.3 — informational
-    # log only, NOT a gate) / A4 / A5 design rationale.
+    # Comment-triggered refires live in review-refire-comments.yml. Keeping
+    # this workflow PR-only avoids comment-triggered queue storms.
    if: |
-      github.event_name == 'pull_request_target' ||
-      (github.event_name == 'issue_comment' &&
-       github.event.issue.pull_request != null &&
-       startsWith(github.event.comment.body, '/security-recheck'))
+      github.event_name == 'pull_request_target'
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
    steps:
      - name: Privilege check (A1.1 — INFORMATIONAL log only, NOT a gate)
--- a/.gitea/workflows/sop-tier-refire.yml
+++ b/.gitea/workflows/sop-tier-refire.yml
@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-# sop-tier-refire — issue_comment-triggered refire of sop-tier-check.
+# sop-tier-refire — manual fallback for sop-tier-check refire.
 #
 # Closes internal#292. Gitea 1.22.6 doesn't refire workflows on the
 # `pull_request_review` event (go-gitea/gitea#33700); the `sop-tier-check`
@ -8,12 +8,12 @@
 # to merge is the admin force-merge path (audited via `audit-force-merge`
 # but the audit trail keeps growing; see `feedback_never_admin_merge_bypass`).
 #
-# Workaround pattern from `feedback_pull_request_review_no_refire`:
-# `issue_comment` events DO fire reliably on 1.22.6. When a repo
-# MEMBER/OWNER/COLLABORATOR comments `/refire-tier-check` on a PR, this
-# workflow re-runs the sop-tier-check logic and POSTs the resulting
-# status to the PR head SHA directly. No empty commit, no git history
-# bloat, no cascade re-fire of every other workflow on the PR.
+# Comment-triggered refires now live in `review-refire-comments.yml`. Gitea
+# queues issue_comment workflows before evaluating job-level `if:`, so having
+# qa-review, security-review, sop-checklist, and sop-tier-refire all subscribe
+# to every comment caused queue storms on SOP-heavy PRs. This workflow is a
+# non-automatic breadcrumb only; Gitea 1.22.6 does not support
+# workflow_dispatch inputs, so real refires must use `/refire-tier-check`.
 #
 # SECURITY MODEL:
 #
@ -37,43 +37,16 @@
 # Rate-limit: a 1s pre-sleep + a "skip if status posted in last 30s"
 # guard prevents comment-spam from thrashing the status. See the script.

-name: sop-tier-check refire (issue_comment)
+name: sop-tier-check refire (manual)

 on:
-  issue_comment:
-    types: [created]
+  workflow_dispatch:

 jobs:
  refire:
-    # Three gates, all required:
-    #   - comment is on a PR (not a plain issue)
-    #   - commenter is MEMBER, OWNER, or COLLABORATOR
-    #   - comment body contains the slash-command trigger
-    if: |
-      github.event.issue.pull_request != null &&
-      contains(fromJson('["MEMBER","OWNER","COLLABORATOR"]'), github.event.comment.author_association) &&
-      contains(github.event.comment.body, '/refire-tier-check')
    runs-on: ubuntu-latest
-    permissions:
-      contents: read
-      pull-requests: read
-      statuses: write
    steps:
-      - name: Check out base branch (for the script)
-        uses: actions/checkout@de0fac2e4500dabe0009e67214ff5f5447ce83dd  # v6.0.2
-        with:
-          # Load the script from the default branch (main), matching the
-          # sop-tier-check.yml security model.
-          ref: ${{ github.event.repository.default_branch }}
-      - name: Re-evaluate sop-tier-check and POST status
-        env:
-          # Same org-level secret sop-tier-check.yml + audit-force-merge.yml use.
-          # Fallback to GITHUB_TOKEN with a clear error if missing.
-          GITEA_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.SOP_TIER_CHECK_TOKEN || secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
-          GITEA_HOST: git.moleculesai.app
-          REPO: ${{ github.repository }}
-          PR_NUMBER: ${{ github.event.issue.number }}
-          COMMENT_AUTHOR: ${{ github.event.comment.user.login }}
-          # Set to '1' for diagnostic per-API-call output. Off by default.
-          SOP_DEBUG: '0'
-        run: bash .gitea/scripts/sop-tier-refire.sh
+      - name: Explain supported refire path
+        run: |
+          echo "::error::Gitea 1.22.6 does not support workflow_dispatch inputs here; comment /refire-tier-check on the PR instead."
+          exit 1