.github/CONTRIBUTING.md
documentation-specialist 4b532ac0a6 docs(contributing): add org-wide CONTRIBUTING.md — Gitea-canonical SCM, branch+PR+merge-commit, no force-push to main
First content for `Molecule-AI/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md`. GitHub
renders `<org>/.github/CONTRIBUTING.md` as the default contributor
guide for any repo in the org that doesn't ship its own.

## What's in scope

- **Where the code lives**: Gitea is canonical (post-2026-05-06 GitHub
  org suspension); GitHub mirror is read-only OSS face. Non-security
  issues at git.moleculesai.app/molecule-ai/internal.
- **How we ship**: branch off main (or staging on platform repos),
  conventional branch names, imperative commit messages, merge by
  merge commit (NOT squash), no force-push to main/staging.
- **Tests + CI + review**: run locally first; fix root cause not
  --no-verify; one-business-day review SLA on non-trivial PRs.
- **What we do NOT require**: no CLA, no bug bounty, no GPG
  enforcement, no mandatory issue templates. Explicit so
  contributors don't waste time on absent features.
- **Boundaries**: no committed secrets, no shared-env cleanup, no
  long-running background jobs in tests.
- **Repo-specific overrides win** when they disagree.

## Length

56 lines (orchestrator target was ~80; landed leaner because the
post-suspension reality + merge-commit shape are the load-bearing
bits and the rest is conventional-wisdom that doesn't need depth).

## Out of scope (parked, file when needed)

- Per-repo CONTRIBUTING overrides — tracked individually.
- Issue + PR templates — would live in profile/.github/ or per-repo;
  current per-repo guidance is fine.
- GPG / CLA / bounty — explicitly called out as NOT required so
  contributors don't infer absence as oversight.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
2026-05-06 18:38:51 -07:00

4.3 KiB

Contributing to Molecule-AI

Thanks for your interest. This file is the org-wide default; individual repos may override with their own CONTRIBUTING.md.

Where the code lives

If you need a Gitea account to open a PR, ping us at the contact in SECURITY.md and we'll create one.

How we ship changes

Every change goes through a PR — no direct pushes to main on any repo, and no direct pushes to staging on platform repos either.

  1. Branch off the right base. Most repos: main. Platform repos (molecule-core, molecule-controlplane): staging. The destination repo's README will say.
  2. Use a descriptive branch name. Conventional shape: <type>/<short-summary>. Types we use: feat, fix, chore, docs, test, refactor, perf. Example: fix/poll-loop-jitter.
  3. Commit messages: imperative mood, present tense. Subject ≤ 72 chars. Body explains the why, not the what (the diff already shows the what). Group commits logically — one concern per commit, no WIP or fix typo noise in the final history. Squash or rebase locally before pushing if needed.
  4. Open a PR. Title matches the lead commit. Description covers: what changed, why, alternatives rejected, rollout/rollback notes. For non-trivial changes, list the three weakest spots in the diff as a hostile self-review — saves the reviewer the work.
  5. Merge by merge commit, never squash. This preserves the per-commit narrative for git blame and bisect. Auto-merge is fine once approved + CI green.
  6. Never force-push to main or staging. Force-pushes on your own feature branch are fine until review starts; after that, prefer additive follow-up commits so the reviewer doesn't lose their place.

Tests, CI, and review

  • Run the test suite locally before pushing. Each repo's README.md documents the command (typically bun test, go test ./..., or npm test). CI runs the same suite; if it fails, fix the root cause — don't --no-verify past hook failures.
  • Every test must be able to fail. No tautologies, no asserting-the-mock, no tests that pass because the code under test was never invoked.
  • Review lands within a business day for non-trivial PRs. We're a small team — feel free to ping in the PR if a review is sitting cold for >2 days.

What we do NOT require

We're being explicit about absent features so contributors don't waste time on them:

  • No CLA. You retain copyright; license is set per-repo (mostly BSL 1.1, see LICENSE).
  • No bug bounty program. Security disclosures are still very welcome — see SECURITY.md.
  • No GPG-signed commit enforcement. Sign if you want; not required.
  • No mandatory issue-template fields. Fill what you can; we'll ask if anything's missing.

If we add any of these later, the change lands in this file via PR like everything else.

Boundaries

  • Don't push secrets, tokens, or .env files. Pre-commit secret-scanning runs in CI but is not infallible. If you do leak something, immediately ping us in the relevant PR or via the SECURITY.md contact and we'll rotate.
  • Don't run cluster-cleanup or mass-delete tests against shared environments — staging is shared.
  • Don't spawn long-running background jobs in test files. They hang CI.

Repo-specific overrides

Some repos add stricter rules (e.g. molecule-core has a coverage floor by package; molecule-controlplane requires staging→main auto-promote PRs to be reviewed even though they're machine-authored). Those live in the repo's own CONTRIBUTING.md or docs/engineering/.

When the repo-specific guidance and this file disagree, the repo-specific guidance wins.


Last updated: 2026-05-06.