molecule-core/docs/architecture/canary-release.md
documentation-specialist 26afbbfdf4 docs(internal): bulk-sed molecule-core .md docs → Gitea (#37 final molecule-core sweep)
Mass-sed across 17 files / 38 active refs in molecule-core .md docs
(README + CONTRIBUTING + docs/architecture/ + docs/blog/ + docs/guides/
+ docs/integrations/ + docs/quickstart.md + scripts/README.md).

Driver: /tmp/sweep_core.py — same pattern set as the
internal-marketing bulk-sed (PR #50). 4 url-substitution patterns +
SKIP_PATTERN preserves /pull/<n> /issues/<n> /commit/<sha>
/releases/... historical refs.

Files NOT touched in this PR:
- docs/workspace-runtime-package.md — owned by molecule-core#15
  (workspace-runtime source-edit per #41). Reverted my bulk-sed of
  that file to avoid merge conflict.
- 2 Go-import-path refs in docs/memory-plugins/testing-your-plugin.md
  (github.com/Molecule-AI/molecule-monorepo/platform/internal/...) —
  Q5 cross-repo Go-module migration territory.
- 1 GitHub Gist link in docs/guides/external-workspace-quickstart.md
  (gist.github.com/molecule-ai/...) — no Gitea equivalent;
  consistent with the same handling in docs#1.

Manual fixes (2):
- docs/blog/2026-04-20-chrome-devtools-mcp-seo/index.md:306 —
  GitHub Discussions (no Gitea equivalent) → issue tracker link
- docs/guides/external-workspace-quickstart.md:218 — tracking-issue
  ?q= query-string url (regex didn't catch) → reformulated text +
  Gitea search-by-query approach

Pattern matches my docs#1 (public docs site) PR + internal#50
(internal/marketing bulk-sed). Standard substitutions:
- https://github.com/Molecule-AI/<repo> → https://git.moleculesai.app/molecule-ai/<repo>
- /blob/<branch>/ + /tree/<branch>/ → /src/branch/<branch>/

Refs: molecule-ai/internal#37, molecule-ai/internal#38
2026-05-07 01:27:50 -07:00

4.9 KiB

Canary release pipeline

How a workspace-server code change reaches the prod tenant fleet — and how to stop it if something's wrong.

⚠️ State note (2026-04-22): this doc describes the intended design. As of this write, the canary fleet described below is not actually running — no canary tenants are provisioned, CANARY_TENANT_URLS / CANARY_ADMIN_TOKENS / CANARY_CP_SHARED_SECRET are empty in repo secrets, and canary-verify.yml fails every run.

Current merges gate on manual promote-latest.yml dispatches, not canary. See molecule-controlplane/docs/canary-tenants.md for the Phase 1 code work that's already shipped + the Phase 2 plan for actually standing up the fleet + a "should we even do this now?" decision framework.

Account-specific identifiers (AWS account ID, IAM role name) referenced below in the original design have been redacted from this public doc. The actual values — if they exist — are in Molecule-AI/internal/runbooks/canary-fleet.md. If you're implementing Phase 2, start there.

When Phase 2 lands, delete this note and reconcile the two docs.

The loop

PR merged to staging → main
      │
      ▼
publish-workspace-server-image.yml   ← pushes :staging-<sha> ONLY
      │                                (NOT :latest — prod is untouched)
      ▼
Canary tenants auto-update to :staging-<sha>
      │   (5-min auto-updater cycle on each canary EC2)
      ▼
canary-verify.yml waits 6 min, runs scripts/canary-smoke.sh
      │
      ├─► GREEN → crane tag :staging-<sha> → :latest
      │                                       │
      │                                       ▼
      │                           Prod tenants auto-update within 5 min
      │
      └─► RED   → :latest stays on prior good digest
                  GitHub Step Summary flags the rejected sha
                  Ops fixes forward OR rolls back manually

Canary fleet

Lives in a separate AWS account via an assumed role. The CP's is_canary org flag routes provisioning there; every other org goes to the default account. Specific account ID and role name are tracked in the internal runbook (Molecule-AI/internal/runbooks/canary-fleet.md) rather than here, so rotating them doesn't require rewriting public git history.

Canary tenants are configured to pull :staging-<sha> (not :latest) via TENANT_IMAGE on their provisioner, so they ingest each new build before prod does.

Smoke suite

scripts/canary-smoke.sh hits each canary tenant (URL + ADMIN_TOKEN pair) and asserts:

  • /admin/liveness returns a subsystems map (tenant booted, AdminAuth reachable)
  • /workspaces returns a JSON array (wsAuth + DB healthy)
  • /memories/commit + /memories/search round-trip (encryption + scrubber)
  • /events admin read (C4 fail-closed proof)
  • /admin/liveness without bearer → 401 (C4 regression gate)

Expand by editing the script — each check "name" "expected" "$response" call is one line.

Adding a canary tenant

  1. POST /cp/orgs — create the org normally (is_canary defaults to false)
  2. POST /cp/admin/orgs/<slug>/canary with {"is_canary": true} — admin only, refuses to flip if already provisioned
  3. Re-trigger provision (or delete + recreate if the org was already provisioned into staging) — the fresh EC2 lands in the canary AWS account (see internal runbook for the specific ID)

Then set repo secrets:

  • CANARY_TENANT_URLS — append the new tenant's URL
  • CANARY_ADMIN_TOKENS — append its ADMIN_TOKEN in the same position

Rolling back :latest

When canary was green but something surfaces post-promotion, retag :latest to a prior digest:

export GITHUB_TOKEN=ghp_...    # write:packages
scripts/rollback-latest.sh 4c1d56e  # retags both platform + tenant images

scripts/rollback-latest.sh pre-checks that :staging-<sha> exists before moving :latest, and verifies the digest after the move. Prod tenants pick up the rolled-back image on their next 5-min auto-update.

A post-mortem should always include:

  • the commit sha that broke
  • why canary didn't catch it (new code path the smoke suite doesn't exercise?)
  • whether the smoke suite should grow a new check to prevent the same class of bug

What this gate doesn't catch

  • Bugs that only surface under prod-only data (customer workloads with scale or shape canary doesn't produce). Canary uses real traffic shapes but can't simulate weeks of accumulated state.
  • Config drift between canary and prod (different env-var values, different feature flags). Keep canary's config deltas minimal and documented.
  • Cross-tenant interactions — canary tenants run in their own AWS account, so a bug that only appears when two tenants compete for a shared resource won't reproduce here.

When these miss, rollback-latest.sh is the escape hatch.