4 Commits

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
documentation-specialist	26afbbfdf4	docs(internal): bulk-sed molecule-core .md docs → Gitea (#37 final molecule-core sweep) ... Mass-sed across 17 files / 38 active refs in molecule-core .md docs (README + CONTRIBUTING + docs/architecture/ + docs/blog/ + docs/guides/ + docs/integrations/ + docs/quickstart.md + scripts/README.md). Driver: /tmp/sweep_core.py — same pattern set as the internal-marketing bulk-sed (PR #50). 4 url-substitution patterns + SKIP_PATTERN preserves /pull/<n> /issues/<n> /commit/<sha> /releases/... historical refs. Files NOT touched in this PR: - docs/workspace-runtime-package.md — owned by molecule-core#15 (workspace-runtime source-edit per #41). Reverted my bulk-sed of that file to avoid merge conflict. - 2 Go-import-path refs in docs/memory-plugins/testing-your-plugin.md (github.com/Molecule-AI/molecule-monorepo/platform/internal/...) — Q5 cross-repo Go-module migration territory. - 1 GitHub Gist link in docs/guides/external-workspace-quickstart.md (gist.github.com/molecule-ai/...) — no Gitea equivalent; consistent with the same handling in docs#1. Manual fixes (2): - docs/blog/2026-04-20-chrome-devtools-mcp-seo/index.md:306 — GitHub Discussions (no Gitea equivalent) → issue tracker link - docs/guides/external-workspace-quickstart.md:218 — tracking-issue ?q= query-string url (regex didn't catch) → reformulated text + Gitea search-by-query approach Pattern matches my docs#1 (public docs site) PR + internal#50 (internal/marketing bulk-sed). Standard substitutions: - https://github.com/Molecule-AI/<repo> → https://git.moleculesai.app/molecule-ai/<repo> - /blob/<branch>/ + /tree/<branch>/ → /src/branch/<branch>/ Refs: molecule-ai/internal#37, molecule-ai/internal#38	2026-05-07 01:27:50 -07:00
Hongming Wang	28bf11fb85	docs(security): move sensitive runbooks to private internal repo ... Three changes to stop ferrying sensitive content through our public monorepo. All content already imported to Molecule-AI/internal (private) — see linked PRs below. Contained full security audit cycle records with CWE references, file:line pointers to historical vulnerabilities, and severity ratings. None of that belongs in a public repo. → Moved to Molecule-AI/internal/security/incident-log.md (PR #20). Monorepo file becomes a 17-line stub pointing at the internal location. Future incidents land in the internal file only. Had AWS account ID `004947743811` and IAM role name `MoleculeStagingProvisioner` embedded. Even though the fleet described isn't actually running (see state note), these identifiers are account-specific and don't belong in public git. → Removed both values, replaced with generic references + a pointer to Molecule-AI/internal/runbooks/canary-fleet.md (PR #21) where the actual identifiers live. Any future rotation touches the internal file, no public-git-history rewrite needed. Contained the full ops runbook: bootstrap script output, per-tenant SG backfill loop with live SG IDs, customer slug names (hongmingwang). Useful content but too specific for a public repo. → Moved to Molecule-AI/internal/runbooks/workspace-terminal.md (PR #22). Monorepo file becomes a 30-line public summary of what the feature does + pointers to code, so external readers / self-hosters still get the design story. Marketing briefs, SEO plans, campaign copy, research dossiers, and internal product designs (hermes-adapter-plan, medo-integration, cognee-*) are the next batches. See docs policy doc coming next to set team expectations. Net removal: ~820 lines from public git going forward. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-04-22 22:39:23 +00:00
airenostars	7a89704b6e	fix(build): add missing fmt import + fix canvas Dockerfile GID (#1487) ... * docs(canary-release): flag as aspirational; link to current state The canary-release.md doc describes the pipeline as if the fleet is running — referring to AWS account 004947743811 and a configured MoleculeStagingProvisioner role. Reality as of 2026-04-22: no canary tenants are provisioned, the 3 GH Actions secrets are empty, and canary-verify.yml has failed 7/7 times in a row. Added a top-of-doc ⚠️ state note that: 1. Clarifies this is intended design, not deployed reality. 2. Notes the AWS account ID is historical / unverified. 3. Explains that merges currently rely on manual promote-latest. 4. Cross-links to molecule-controlplane/docs/canary-tenants.md for the Phase 1 work that's shipped, the Phase 2 stand-up plan, and the "should we even do this now?" decision framework. 5. Asks whoever lands Phase 2 to reconcile the two docs. No behaviour change — doc-only. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> * fix(build): add missing fmt import in a2a_proxy.go, fix canvas Dockerfile GID - a2a_proxy.go: missing "fmt" import caused build failure (8 undefined references at lines 743-775). Likely dropped during a recent merge. - canvas/Dockerfile: GID 1000 already in use in node base image. Changed to dynamic group/user creation with fallback. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Hongming Wang <hongmingwang.rabbit@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com> Co-authored-by: Hongming Wang <hongmingwangrabbit@gmail.com>	2026-04-22 21:10:58 +00:00
Hongming Wang	eecce56c13	feat(canary): rollback-latest script + release-pipeline doc (Phase 4) ... Closes the canary loop with the escape hatch and a single place to read about the whole flow. scripts/rollback-latest.sh <sha> uses crane to retag :latest ← :staging-<sha> for BOTH the platform and tenant images. Pre-checks the target tag exists and verifies the :latest digest after the move so a bad ops typo doesn't silently promote the wrong thing. Prod tenants auto-update to the rolled-back digest within their 5-min cycle. Exit codes: 0 = both retagged, 1 = registry/tag error, 2 = usage error. docs/architecture/canary-release.md The one-page map of the pipeline: how PR → main → staging-<sha> → canary smoke → :latest promotion works end-to-end, how to add a canary tenant, how to roll back, and what this gate explicitly does NOT catch (prod-only data, config drift, cross-tenant bugs). No code changes in the CP or workspace-server — this PR is shell + docs only, so it's safe to land independently of the other Phase {1,1.5,2,3} PRs still in review. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>	2026-04-19 03:37:42 -07:00