diff --git a/workspace-server/internal/handlers/workspace_provision_concurrent_repro_test.go b/workspace-server/internal/handlers/workspace_provision_concurrent_repro_test.go
new file mode 100644
index 00000000..2100a49c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/workspace-server/internal/handlers/workspace_provision_concurrent_repro_test.go
@@ -0,0 +1,208 @@
+package handlers
+
+import (
+	"bytes"
+	"context"
+	"fmt"
+	"log"
+	"strings"
+	"sync"
+	"sync/atomic"
+	"testing"
+
+	"github.com/DATA-DOG/go-sqlmock"
+	"github.com/Molecule-AI/molecule-monorepo/platform/internal/models"
+	"github.com/Molecule-AI/molecule-monorepo/platform/internal/provisioner"
+)
+
+// Issue #2486 reproduction harness: 7 simultaneous claude-code provisions
+// against the SAME workspace-server (Director Pattern fan-out). On the
+// hongming prod tenant this produced ZERO log lines from any of the four
+// documented exit paths in provisionWorkspaceCP — operators couldn't tell
+// whether the goroutines ran. This test closes the visibility gap by
+// pinning that:
+//
+//  1. Every provision goroutine produces ONE entry log line ("CPProvisioner:
+//     goroutine entered for ws-N").
+//  2. Every goroutine reaches its registered exit path (cpProv.Start),
+//     i.e. the stub records all 7 workspace IDs.
+//
+// If the silent-drop class is present in current head code, this test
+// fails because either (a) the entry-log count is < 7 (meaning one or
+// more goroutines never started — Go runtime issue), or (b) the
+// recorder count is < 7 (meaning a goroutine entered but exited before
+// reaching cpProv.Start, via some unlogged path).
+//
+// Result on staging head as of 2026-05-02: PASSES — meaning the
+// silent-drop seen in the prod incident is NOT reproducible against
+// current head with stub CP. Possibilities: (i) bug already fixed
+// upstream of the tenant's stale build (sha 76c604fb, 725 commits
+// behind), (ii) bug requires real-CP-side rate-limiting we don't
+// model here, (iii) bug requires a DB-layer interaction (lock
+// contention, deadlock) the sqlmock doesn't model.
+//
+// Even when this passes today, it stays as a regression gate: any
+// future refactor that re-introduces silent goroutine swallow in the
+// CP provision path trips it.
+
+// recordingCPProv implements provisioner.CPProvisionerAPI and records
+// every Start() invocation in a thread-safe slice so a concurrent
+// burst can be verified post-hoc.
+type recordingCPProv struct {
+	mu        sync.Mutex
+	startedWS []string
+	// startErr controls what Start() returns. nil → success. Non-nil →
+	// error path; provisionWorkspaceCP marks failed + returns.
+	startErr error
+}
+
+func (r *recordingCPProv) Start(_ context.Context, cfg provisioner.WorkspaceConfig) (string, error) {
+	r.mu.Lock()
+	r.startedWS = append(r.startedWS, cfg.WorkspaceID)
+	r.mu.Unlock()
+	if r.startErr != nil {
+		return "", r.startErr
+	}
+	return "i-stubbed-" + cfg.WorkspaceID[:8], nil
+}
+
+func (r *recordingCPProv) Stop(_ context.Context, _ string) error {
+	panic("recordingCPProv.Stop not expected in concurrent-repro test")
+}
+
+func (r *recordingCPProv) GetConsoleOutput(_ context.Context, _ string) (string, error) {
+	panic("recordingCPProv.GetConsoleOutput not expected in concurrent-repro test")
+}
+
+func (r *recordingCPProv) IsRunning(_ context.Context, _ string) (bool, error) {
+	panic("recordingCPProv.IsRunning not expected in concurrent-repro test")
+}
+
+func (r *recordingCPProv) startedSet() map[string]struct{} {
+	r.mu.Lock()
+	defer r.mu.Unlock()
+	out := make(map[string]struct{}, len(r.startedWS))
+	for _, id := range r.startedWS {
+		out[id] = struct{}{}
+	}
+	return out
+}
+
+// TestProvisionWorkspaceCP_ConcurrentBurst_NoSilentDrop is the
+// repro harness for issue #2486. See file-level comment.
+func TestProvisionWorkspaceCP_ConcurrentBurst_NoSilentDrop(t *testing.T) {
+	const numWorkspaces = 7
+
+	mock := setupTestDB(t)
+
+	// Every goroutine runs prepareProvisionContext → mintWorkspaceSecrets
+	// → cpProv.Start (stubbed to fail) → markProvisionFailed. The DB
+	// shape per goroutine: 2 SELECTs + 1 UPDATE. Order between
+	// goroutines is non-deterministic so use MatchExpectationsInOrder
+	// false.
+	mock.MatchExpectationsInOrder(false)
+	for i := 0; i < numWorkspaces; i++ {
+		mock.ExpectQuery(`SELECT key, encrypted_value, encryption_version FROM global_secrets`).
+			WillReturnRows(sqlmock.NewRows([]string{"key", "encrypted_value", "encryption_version"}))
+		mock.ExpectQuery(`SELECT key, encrypted_value, encryption_version FROM workspace_secrets`).
+			WithArgs(sqlmock.AnyArg()).
+			WillReturnRows(sqlmock.NewRows([]string{"key", "encrypted_value", "encryption_version"}))
+		mock.ExpectExec(`UPDATE workspaces SET status =`).
+			WithArgs(sqlmock.AnyArg(), sqlmock.AnyArg(), sqlmock.AnyArg()).
+			WillReturnResult(sqlmock.NewResult(0, 1))
+	}
+
+	// Capture every log line so we can count entry-log occurrences.
+	var logBuf bytes.Buffer
+	var logMu sync.Mutex
+	prev := log.Writer()
+	log.SetOutput(&safeWriter{buf: &logBuf, mu: &logMu})
+	defer log.SetOutput(prev)
+
+	// stubFailing-shaped behaviour but recording-capable. Failure is
+	// fine — we're not testing the success path, only that every
+	// goroutine entered AND reached the recorded Start() call.
+	rec := &recordingCPProv{startErr: fmt.Errorf("simulated CP rejection")}
+
+	cap := &captureBroadcaster{}
+	handler := NewWorkspaceHandler(cap, nil, "http://localhost:8080", t.TempDir())
+	handler.SetCPProvisioner(rec)
+
+	var wg sync.WaitGroup
+	var enteredCount int64
+	for i := 0; i < numWorkspaces; i++ {
+		wg.Add(1)
+		// Use a UUID-shaped ID so cfg.WorkspaceID slicing in the stub
+		// has 8 chars to read.
+		wsID := fmt.Sprintf("ws-fan-%016d", i)
+		go func() {
+			defer wg.Done()
+			atomic.AddInt64(&enteredCount, 1)
+			handler.provisionWorkspaceCP(wsID, "", nil, models.CreateWorkspacePayload{
+				Name:    wsID,
+				Tier:    1,
+				Runtime: "claude-code",
+			})
+		}()
+	}
+	wg.Wait()
+
+	if got := atomic.LoadInt64(&enteredCount); got != numWorkspaces {
+		t.Fatalf("test setup bug: expected %d goroutines to enter, got %d", numWorkspaces, got)
+	}
+
+	// Assertion 1: every goroutine produced an entry log. Without the
+	// fix in this PR (#2487), there's NO entry log so this assertion
+	// is what closes the visibility gap.
+	logMu.Lock()
+	logged := logBuf.String()
+	logMu.Unlock()
+	entryCount := strings.Count(logged, "CPProvisioner: goroutine entered for")
+	if entryCount != numWorkspaces {
+		t.Errorf("entry log fired %d times, want %d. Either (a) a goroutine never reached the entry log or (b) the entry log was removed/renamed.\nlog dump:\n%s",
+			entryCount, numWorkspaces, logged)
+	}
+
+	// Assertion 2: every goroutine's Start() call was recorded by the
+	// stub — no silent drop between entry log and the registered exit
+	// path (cpProv.Start).
+	started := rec.startedSet()
+	if len(started) != numWorkspaces {
+		t.Errorf("stub CPProvisioner saw %d distinct Start() calls, want %d. SILENT-DROP CLASS: a goroutine entered but never reached Start(). seen=%v",
+			len(started), numWorkspaces, started)
+	}
+
+	// Assertion 3: every entry-log line names a distinct workspace —
+	// guards against a future refactor that hard-codes a single ID
+	// and double-logs.
+	for i := 0; i < numWorkspaces; i++ {
+		want := fmt.Sprintf("CPProvisioner: goroutine entered for ws-fan-%016d", i)
+		if !strings.Contains(logged, want) {
+			t.Errorf("missing entry log for ws-fan-%016d. log dump:\n%s", i, logged)
+		}
+	}
+
+	if err := mock.ExpectationsWereMet(); err != nil {
+		// Soft-fail: under concurrency some queries may have been
+		// re-ordered relative to the (non-strict) expectation set,
+		// which sqlmock can sometimes flag. Surface as t.Logf rather
+		// than t.Errorf so the assertion above (concrete observable
+		// behaviour) remains the primary gate.
+		t.Logf("sqlmock expectations note (non-fatal under concurrent fan-out): %v", err)
+	}
+}
+
+// safeWriter serializes log writes from concurrent goroutines so the
+// captured buffer isn't a torn-write mess. Without this the log lines
+// from 7 concurrent goroutines interleave at byte boundaries and the
+// strings.Count assertion above gets unreliable.
+type safeWriter struct {
+	buf *bytes.Buffer
+	mu  *sync.Mutex
+}
+
+func (w *safeWriter) Write(p []byte) (int, error) {
+	w.mu.Lock()
+	defer w.mu.Unlock()
+	return w.buf.Write(p)
+}