molecule-core/.gitea/scripts
claude-ceo-assistant 2d096aa7ae feat(ci): sop-tier-check refire workflow via issue_comment (internal#292)
## Why

Gitea 1.22.6's `pull_request_review` event doesn't refire workflows
(go-gitea/gitea#33700). The existing sop-tier-check workflow subscribes
to the review event, but the subscription is silently dead. When an
approving review lands AFTER tier-check ran on PR-open/synchronize, the
PR's `sop-tier-check / tier-check (pull_request)` status stays at
failure forever, forcing the orchestrator down the admin force-merge
path (audited via audit-force-merge.yml, but the audit trail keeps
growing — see feedback_never_admin_merge_bypass).

## What

New `.gitea/workflows/sop-tier-refire.yml` listening on `issue_comment`
events. When a repo MEMBER/OWNER/COLLABORATOR comments
`/refire-tier-check` on a PR, the workflow re-invokes the canonical
sop-tier-check.sh and POSTs the resulting status directly to the PR
head SHA (no empty commit, no git history bloat, no cascade re-fire of
every other workflow).

## Security model

Three gates in the workflow `if:` expression — all required:

1. `github.event.issue.pull_request != null` — comment is on a PR, not
   a plain issue.
2. `author_association` ∈ {MEMBER, OWNER, COLLABORATOR} — only repo
   collaborators+ can flip the status (per the internal#292 core-security
   review#1066 ask).
3. Comment body contains `/refire-tier-check` — slash-command-shaped,
   not just any word in normal review prose.

Workflow does NOT check out PR HEAD; only HTTP-calls the Gitea API.
Same trust boundary as sop-tier-check.yml's `pull_request_target`.

## DRY: re-uses sop-tier-check.sh

Refire shells out to the canonical script with the same env the original
workflow provides. We get the EXACT AND-composition gate, not a
watered-down approving-count check.

## Rate-limit

30-second window between status updates per PR head SHA — prevents
comment-spam status thrash. Override via SOP_REFIRE_RATE_LIMIT_SEC or
disable for tests via SOP_REFIRE_DISABLE_RATE_LIMIT=1.

## Tests

`.gitea/scripts/tests/test_sop_tier_refire.sh` — 23 assertions across
T1-T7 covering: success POST, failure POST, no-op on closed, rate-limit
skip, plus YAML-level checks of all three security gates. Real script
runs against a local-fixture HTTP server (`_refire_fixture.py`) with a
mock tier-check (`_mock_tier_check.sh`) — the latter sidesteps the
known bash 3.2 (macOS dev) parser bug on `declare -A`; Linux Gitea
runners (bash 4/5) use the real sop-tier-check.sh in production.

Hostile self-review verified:
- Tests FAIL on absent code (exit 1, FAIL=2 PASS=0 in existence-block).
- Tests FAIL on swapped success/failure label (exit 1).
- Tests PASS on correct code (exit 0, 23/23).

## Brief-falsification log

(a) Keep using force_merge — no, this is the issue being closed.
(b) Empty-commit re-trigger — no, status-POST is cleaner + faster +
    doesn't bloat git history.
(c) author_association check in the script not the workflow — both work
    but workflow-level short-circuits faster (saves runner spin).
(d) Re-implement a watered-down tier-check inside refire — no, that's a
    security regression (skips team-membership AND-composition).
    Refire shells out to the canonical script.

Tier: tier:high (unblocks approved-PR-backlog drain class).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-11 02:44:31 -07:00
..
tests feat(ci): sop-tier-check refire workflow via issue_comment (internal#292) 2026-05-11 02:44:31 -07:00
audit-force-merge.sh ci(audit-force-merge): fan §SOP-6 force-merge audit to molecule-core 2026-05-08 20:09:35 -07:00
ci-required-drift.py feat(internal#219 §4+§6): port ci-required-drift + audit-force-merge sidecar from CP 2026-05-11 00:35:25 -07:00
main-red-watchdog.py feat(ci): main-red watchdog (Option C of main-never-red directive) — closes #420 2026-05-11 00:36:20 -07:00
sop-tier-check.sh fix(sop-tier-check): flip jq install to apt-get-first (infra#241 follow-up) 2026-05-11 08:19:02 +00:00
sop-tier-refire.sh feat(ci): sop-tier-check refire workflow via issue_comment (internal#292) 2026-05-11 02:44:31 -07:00