Completes the Hermes adapter's native-SDK plan for the provider that gains
the most from leaving OpenAI-compat: Anthropic. OpenAI-compat works fine for
plain text turns on every provider (Phase 1 covered that with one code path
for all 15 providers), but Anthropic's Messages API has first-class tool use,
vision content blocks, and extended thinking that the OpenAI-compat shim
strips or mis-translates.
Rather than ship all native SDK paths in one PR (Anthropic + Gemini + future),
this lands Anthropic only (Phase 2a). Gemini is Phase 2b, shipping after a
production measurement window on Phase 2a.
## Design
Providers now dispatch by `auth_scheme` field. Phase 1 added the field but
every provider used `"openai"`. Phase 2 flips `anthropic` to `"anthropic"`
and wires a second inference path keyed on that:
- `HermesA2AExecutor._do_openai_compat(task_text)` — existing path, handles
14 of 15 providers (Nous Portal, OpenRouter, OpenAI, xAI, Gemini, Qwen,
GLM, Kimi, MiniMax, DeepSeek, Groq, Together, Fireworks, Mistral)
- `HermesA2AExecutor._do_anthropic_native(task_text)` — NEW, uses the
official `anthropic` Python SDK's `AsyncAnthropic().messages.create(...)`
- `HermesA2AExecutor._do_inference(task_text)` — dispatches by
`self.provider_cfg.auth_scheme`
Unknown schemes fall back to OpenAI-compat with a logged warning, so future
provider additions don't crash if a native SDK path ships late.
## Fail-loud on missing SDK
`_do_anthropic_native` raises a clear `RuntimeError` with install
instructions if the `anthropic` package is missing at runtime:
Hermes anthropic native path requires the `anthropic` package. Install
in the workspace image with `pip install anthropic>=0.39.0` or set
HERMES provider=openrouter to route Claude models through OpenRouter's
OpenAI-compat shim instead.
This is intentional: silent fallback would mask fidelity loss (tool_use
blocks become plain text, vision gets stripped). Loud failure is better.
`requirements.txt` adds `anthropic>=0.39.0` so the package is baked into
the workspace-template image build path. Operators building custom workspace
images without anthropic installed get the loud error.
## Back-compat
- `create_executor(hermes_api_key="x")` → still routes to Nous Portal
(`auth_scheme="openai"`), unchanged
- `HERMES_API_KEY` env var → still first in RESOLUTION_ORDER
- `OPENROUTER_API_KEY` env var → still second
- All 14 OpenAI-compat providers unchanged — they take the same code path
as before
- ONLY `anthropic` provider changes behavior: it now uses the native
Messages API instead of the `/v1/chat/completions` compat shim
## Constructor signature change
`HermesA2AExecutor.__init__` now takes `provider_cfg: ProviderConfig`
instead of separate `api_key + base_url + model`. The three fields are
derived from `provider_cfg` + an optional model override. This is a
breaking change for any external caller building an executor directly,
but the only documented public entry point is `create_executor()`, which
is updated in the same commit to pass the cfg through.
## Test coverage
`workspace-template/tests/test_hermes_phase2_dispatch.py` — 7 new tests:
1. `test_anthropic_entry_has_anthropic_scheme` — registry flip
2. `test_all_other_providers_still_openai_scheme` — regression guard
3. `test_dispatch_openai_scheme_calls_openai_compat` — happy path
4. `test_dispatch_anthropic_scheme_calls_anthropic_native` — happy path
5. `test_dispatch_unknown_scheme_falls_back_to_openai_compat` — forward compat
6. `test_anthropic_native_raises_clear_error_when_sdk_missing` — fail-loud
7. `test_create_executor_passes_provider_cfg` — constructor wiring
All pass locally (pytest tests/test_hermes_phase2_dispatch.py -v, 0.04s).
Phase 1 tests unchanged: `test_hermes_providers.py` 26/26 pass, no
regressions.
## What's NOT in this PR (Phase 2b)
- Gemini native `generateContent` path (`auth_scheme="gemini"`)
- Streaming support across both native paths (`astream_messages`, `streamGenerateContent`)
- Tool calling on the anthropic native path (the `tools` + `tool_use` blocks)
- Vision content blocks (image_url → anthropic image blocks)
- Extended thinking parameter passthrough
All scoped in `project_hermes_multi_provider.md`. Phase 2a is the minimum
viable native Anthropic dispatch — single-turn text in, text out, no tools.
## Related
- Phase 1 baseline (already in main): #208 — provider registry + OpenAI-compat path
- Queued memory: `project_hermes_multi_provider.md` — full phased plan
- Triggering directive: CEO 2026-04-15 — "once current works are cleared,
focus on supporting hermes agent"
|
||
|---|---|---|
| .claude | ||
| .githooks | ||
| .github/workflows | ||
| canvas | ||
| docs | ||
| infra | ||
| mcp-server | ||
| org-templates | ||
| platform | ||
| plugins | ||
| scripts | ||
| sdk/python | ||
| tests | ||
| workspace-configs-templates | ||
| workspace-template | ||
| .env.example | ||
| .gitattributes | ||
| .gitignore | ||
| .mcp.json | ||
| AGENTS.md | ||
| CLAUDE.md | ||
| docker-compose.infra.yml | ||
| docker-compose.yml | ||
| HANDOFF.md | ||
| LICENSE | ||
| PLAN.md | ||
| railway.toml | ||
| README.md | ||
| README.zh-CN.md | ||
| render.yaml | ||
The Org-Native Control Plane For Heterogeneous AI Agent Teams
The world's most powerful governance platform for AI agent teams.
Visual Canvas • Runtime Compatibility • Hierarchical Memory • Skill Evolution • Operational Guardrails
Docs Home • Quick Start • Architecture • Platform API • Workspace Runtime
The Pitch
Molecule AI is the most powerful way to govern an AI agent organization in production.
It combines the parts that are usually scattered across demos, internal glue code, and framework-specific tooling into one product:
- one org-native control plane for teams, roles, hierarchy, and lifecycle
- one runtime layer that lets LangGraph, DeepAgents, Claude Code, CrewAI, AutoGen, and OpenClaw run side by side
- one memory model that keeps recall, sharing, and skill evolution aligned with organizational boundaries
- one operational surface for observing, pausing, restarting, inspecting, and improving live workspaces
Most teams can build a workflow, a strong single agent, a coding agent, or a custom multi-agent graph.
Very few teams can run all of that as a governed organization with clear structure, durable memory boundaries, and production operations.
That is the gap Molecule AI closes.
Why Molecule AI Feels Different
1. The node is a role, not a task
In Molecule AI, a workspace is an organizational role. That role can begin as one agent, later expand into a sub-team, and still keep the same external identity, hierarchy position, memory boundary, and A2A interface.
2. The org chart is the topology
You do not wire collaboration paths by hand. Hierarchy defines the default communication surface. The structure is not decorative UI. It is part of the operating model.
3. Runtime choice stops being a dead-end decision
LangGraph, DeepAgents, Claude Code, CrewAI, AutoGen, and OpenClaw can all plug into the same workspace abstraction. Teams can standardize governance without forcing every group onto one runtime.
4. Memory is treated like infrastructure
Molecule AI's HMA approach is designed around organizational boundaries, not just “store more context somewhere.” Durable recall, scoped sharing, awareness namespaces, and skill promotion are all part of one coherent system.
5. It comes with a real control plane
Registry, heartbeats, restart, pause/resume, activity logs, approvals, terminal access, files, traces, bundles, templates, and WebSocket fanout are not afterthoughts. They are first-class parts of the platform.
The Category Gap Molecule AI Fills
| Category | What it does well | Where it breaks | What Molecule AI adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| Workflow builders | Visual task automation | Nodes are tasks, not durable organizational roles | Role-native workspaces, hierarchy, long-lived teams |
| Agent frameworks | Strong runtime semantics | Weak control plane and weak org-level operations | Unified lifecycle, canvas, registry, policies, observability |
| Coding agents | Excellent local execution | Usually not designed as team infrastructure | Workspace abstraction, A2A collaboration, platform ops |
| Custom multi-agent graphs | Full flexibility | Brittle topology and governance sprawl | Standardized operating model without losing runtime freedom |
What Makes Molecule AI Defensible
| Advantage | Why it matters in practice |
|---|---|
| Role-native workspace abstraction | Your org structure survives model swaps, framework changes, and team expansion |
| Fractal team expansion | A single specialist can become a managed department without breaking upstream integrations |
| Heterogeneous runtime compatibility | Different teams can keep their preferred agent architecture while sharing one control plane |
| HMA + awareness namespaces | Memory sharing follows hierarchy instead of leaking across the whole system |
| Skill evolution loop | Durable successful workflows can graduate from memory into reusable, hot-reloadable skills |
| WebSocket-first operational UX | The canvas reflects task state, structure changes, and A2A responses in near real time |
| Global secrets with local override | Centralize provider access, then override only where a workspace needs specialized credentials |
Runtime Compatibility, Compared
Molecule AI is not trying to replace the frameworks below. It is the system that makes them easier to run together.
| Runtime / architecture | Status in current repo | Native strength | What Molecule AI adds |
|---|---|---|---|
| LangGraph | Shipping on main |
Graph control, tool use, Python extensibility | Canvas orchestration, hierarchy routing, A2A, memory scopes, operational lifecycle |
| DeepAgents | Shipping on main |
Deeper planning and decomposition | Same workspace contract, team topology, activity stream, restart behavior |
| Claude Code | Shipping on main |
Real coding workflows, CLI-native continuity | Secure workspace abstraction, A2A delegation, org boundaries, shared control plane |
| CrewAI | Shipping on main |
Role-based crews | Persistent workspace identity, policy consistency, shared canvas and registry |
| AutoGen | Shipping on main |
Assistant/tool orchestration | Standardized deployment, hierarchy-aware collaboration, shared ops plane |
| OpenClaw | Shipping on main |
CLI-native runtime with its own session model | Workspace lifecycle, templates, activity logs, topology-aware collaboration |
| NemoClaw | WIP on feat/nemoclaw-t4-docker |
NVIDIA-oriented runtime path | Planned to join the same abstraction once merged; not yet part of main |
This is the key idea: many agent runtimes, one organizational operating system.
Why The Memory Architecture Compounds
Most projects stop at “we added memory.” Molecule AI pushes further:
| Conventional memory setup | Molecule AI |
|---|---|
| Flat store or weak namespaces | Hierarchy-aligned LOCAL, TEAM, GLOBAL scopes |
| Sharing is easy to overexpose | Sharing is explicit and structure-aware |
| Memory and procedure get mixed together | Memory stores durable facts; skills store repeatable procedure |
| Every agent can become over-privileged | Workspace awareness namespaces reduce blast radius |
| UI memory and runtime memory blur together | Separate surfaces for scoped agent memory, key/value workspace memory, and recall |
The flywheel
Task execution
-> durable insight captured in memory
-> repeated success becomes a signal
-> workflow promoted into a reusable skill
-> skill hot-reloads into the runtime
-> future work gets faster and more reliable
This is one of Molecule AI's strongest long-term advantages: the system can get more operationally capable without turning into one giant hidden prompt.
Self-Improving Agent Teams, Built Into Molecule AI
Most agent systems stop at "a smart runtime." Molecule AI pushes further: it gives teams a way to capture what worked, promote repeatable procedure into skills, reload those improvements into live workspaces, and keep the whole loop visible at the platform level.
| Positioning lens | Conventional self-improving agent pattern | Molecule AI |
|---|---|---|
| Unit of improvement | A single agent session or runtime | A workspace, a team, and eventually the whole org graph |
| Operational surface | Mostly hidden inside the agent loop | Visible in the platform, Canvas, activity stream, memory surfaces, and runtime controls |
| Strategic outcome | A smarter agent | A compounding organization with durable knowledge and governed reusable skills |
Where that shows up in Molecule AI
| Core mechanism | Molecule AI module(s) | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Durable memory that survives sessions | workspace-template/builtin_tools/memory.py, workspace-template/builtin_tools/awareness_client.py, platform/internal/handlers/memories.go |
Memory is not just durable, it is workspace-scoped and can route into awareness namespaces tied to the org structure |
| Cross-session recall | platform/internal/handlers/activity.go (/workspaces/:id/session-search) |
Recall spans both activity history and memory rows, so the system can search what happened and what was learned without inventing a separate hidden store |
| Skills built from experience | workspace-template/builtin_tools/memory.py (_maybe_log_skill_promotion) |
Promotion from memory into a skill candidate is surfaced as an explicit platform activity, not a silent internal side effect |
| Skill improvement during use | workspace-template/skill_loader/watcher.py, workspace-template/skill_loader/loader.py, workspace-template/main.py |
Skills hot-reload into the live runtime, so improvements become available on the next A2A task without restarting the workspace |
| Persistent skill lifecycle | platform/cmd/cli/cmd_agent_skill.go, workspace-template/plugins.py |
Skills are not just generated once; they can be audited, installed, published, shared, mounted by plugins, and governed as reusable operational assets |
Why this matters in Molecule AI
-
The learning loop is org-aware, not just session-aware. Memory can live at
LOCAL,TEAM, orGLOBALscope, and awareness namespaces give each workspace a durable identity boundary. -
The learning loop is visible to operators. Promotion events, activity logs, current-task updates, traces, and WebSocket fanout mean self-improvement is part of the control plane, not a hidden black box.
-
The learning loop compounds across teams, not just one agent. A workflow learned by one workspace can become a governed skill, reload into the runtime, appear in the Agent Card, and become usable inside a larger organizational hierarchy.
The result is not just “an agent that learns.” It is an organization that gets more capable as its workspaces accumulate durable memory and reusable procedure.
What Ships In main
Canvas
- Next.js 15 + React Flow + Zustand
- drag-to-nest team building
- empty-state deployment + onboarding wizard
- template palette
- bundle import/export
- 10-tab side panel for chat, activity, details, skills, terminal, config, files, memory, traces, and events
Platform
- Go/Gin control plane
- workspace CRUD and provisioning
- registry and heartbeats
- browser-safe A2A proxy
- team expansion/collapse
- activity logs and approvals
- secrets and global secrets
- files API, terminal, bundles, templates, viewport persistence
Runtime
- unified
workspace-template/image - adapter-driven execution
- Agent Card registration
- awareness-backed memory integration
- plugin-mounted shared rules/skills
- hot-reloadable local skills
- coordinator-only delegation path
Ops
- Langfuse traces
- current-task reporting
- pause/resume/restart flows
- activity streaming
- runtime tiers
- direct workspace inspection through terminal and files
Built For Teams That Need More Than A Demo
Molecule AI is especially strong when you need to run:
- AI engineering teams with PM / Dev Lead / QA / Research / Ops roles
- mixed runtime organizations where one team prefers LangGraph and another prefers Claude Code
- long-lived agent organizations that need memory boundaries and reusable procedures
- internal platforms that want to expose agent teams as structured infrastructure, not ad hoc scripts
Architecture
Canvas (Next.js :3000) <--HTTP / WS--> Platform (Go :8080) <---> Postgres + Redis
| |
| +--> Docker provisioner / bundles / templates / secrets
|
+-------------------- shows --------------------> workspaces, teams, tasks, traces, events
Workspace Runtime (Python image with adapters)
- LangGraph / DeepAgents / Claude Code / CrewAI / AutoGen / OpenClaw
- Agent Card + A2A server
- heartbeat + activity + awareness-backed memory
- skills + plugins + hot reload
Quick Start
git clone https://github.com/Molecule-AI/molecule-monorepo.git
cd molecule-monorepo
./infra/scripts/setup.sh
# Boots Postgres (:5432), Redis (:6379), Langfuse (:3001),
# and Temporal (:7233 gRPC, :8233 UI) on the shared
# `molecule-monorepo-net` Docker network. Temporal runs with
# no auth on localhost — dev-only; production must gate it.
cd platform
go run ./cmd/server
cd ../canvas
npm install
npm run dev
Then open http://localhost:3000:
- Deploy a template or create a blank workspace from the empty state.
- Follow the onboarding guide into
Config. - Add a provider key in
Secrets & API Keys. - Open
Chatand send the first task.
Documentation Map
- Docs Home
- Quick Start
- Product Overview
- System Architecture
- Memory Architecture
- Platform API
- Workspace Runtime
- Canvas UI
- Local Development
- Ecosystem Watch — adjacent projects we track (Holaboss, Hermes, gstack, …)
Current Scope
The current main branch already includes the core platform, canvas, memory model, six production adapters, skill lifecycle, and operational surfaces. Adjacent runtime work such as NemoClaw remains branch-level until merged, and this README keeps that distinction explicit on purpose.
License
Business Source License 1.1 — copyright © 2025 Molecule AI.
Personal, internal, and non-commercial use is permitted without restriction. You may not use the Licensed Work to offer a competing product or service. On January 1, 2029, the license converts to Apache 2.0.
